avatar The Author
Comments migrated from WordPress:
Oh, also, I couldn’t help but note - the eldrae were created initially as servitors? Well now, that somewhat explains their antipathy (to put it mildly) for slavers, now doesn’t it?
Alistair Young <athanasius.skytower@arkane-systems.net> on 2016-08-12 20:51:21 wrote:Well, it’s not like that’s known in-universe as more than vague archaeological speculation, I should stipulate. That was hundreds of thousands of years pre-Imperial, followed by the Chaos smashing the Precursor civilization, followed by the First, Now Basically Entirely Forgotten Eldrae Civilization, followed by the asteroid impact and Winter of Nightmares killing almost everyone, followed by the Second And Kinda Mythical civilization, followed by the Gray Wasting plague that halved the planetary population again, followed by the Third And Distinctly Legendary Civilization, the Drowning of the People, the Ungoverned Era, and only then do we get to the Old Empires and history that, come the modern day, can be considered reasonably well recorded…
So, y’know, with all that deep time in there, these days it’s more a matter of temperament than any sort of lingering resentment.
[T]here’s a related effect in product design and manufacturing, which can be summed up as: the more options, the better, since products that aren’t hugely customizable don’t sell……Which leads me to wonder: What happens to those people who sell something as “infinitely customizable” (but that realistically only has a very narrow range of customizability) and then invoke Zeno’s paradox when they’re inevitably called on it?
jrdougan <jdougan@acm.org> on 2016-08-12 20:06:22 wrote:I don’t think actual Eldrae would use the concept Infinite Customizability, they would be aware that it is a finite, though potentially very large, state space they are navigating (unless they are in a universe that is not quantized but continuous). For that matter, Our Gracious Host didn’t say that either. Would Eldrae sales and marketing sophs exaggerate that kind of thing?
If I had to make a guess, the “hugely customizable” devices will be programmable in some standard approach with extensions or via something like external APIs. This means if someone complains about lack of customizability, you can reflect the onus back on them. (“We can’t help your lack of imagination. Here is the card of a reputable device programmer who can help you.”)
Alistair Young <athanasius.skytower@arkane-systems.net> on 2016-08-12 21:05:43 wrote:Best not to exaggerate that kind of thing, what with Falsification of Information being in the criminal code. They are, as always, permitted a certain degree of subjective puffery, but stretching facts is a rather more perilous game. (And anything like the vitamin advertisement I saw today that talked about how they would “restore your cell walls” is going to land you straight in deep legal issues.)
It also doesn’t help that within delta of everyone has taken at least one course in memetics and so has a good idea what manipulative idea-injection techniques and content-free glitz look like.
As for customizability, yes, indeed - there are a lot of open APIs and protocols, and most devices have complete documentation including customization recipes, etc., built right into them using v-tags. There’s also a lot of modularity in design, which simplifies both extensions and home-builds, but also makes it easy for sellers of bigger devices (flitters, say) to plug together exactly the custom model you want from a very extensive range of parts, plus some custom module-building in special cases.
Specialist290 <specialist290@hughes.net> on 2016-08-12 21:31:07 wrote:I didn’t say the eldrae themselves would be the ones trying this trick.
That bit at the beginning is me in front of the toothpaste selection