November 2024
Comments migrated from WordPress:
Specialist290 <carpentereli@outlook.com> on 2018-09-16 09:31:43 wrote:
And this line of thinking is precisely why I question the eldrae’s claim to hold the moral high ground – or, indeed, their claim to themselves being sane.
(Given that discussions along this theme have tended to get… explosive in the past, that’s all I’m going to say.)
Alistair Young <athanasius.skytower@arkane-systems.net> on 2018-10-03 01:56:16 wrote:
To reply less irritably:
The other line of thinking here which General Politeran does not point out is that the soft approach produces false positives.
Everyone’s nice to, and in the presence of, an external force with a velvet glove of +5 empathy and a big stick. Obvious example: pretty much any of the many domestic abusers who seemed like such nice, quiet people who would never dream of doing such a thing. Doesn’t tell you a damn thing about who they are when you’re not standing over 'em or what they’re going to do when you leave.
The Imperial approach, on the other hand, is that if they don’t behave like civilized chaps in the dark, when [they think] no-one’s watching, and without anyone praising them for doing it, then they haven’t learned a gorramn thing. You’re supposed to do the right thing even when it hurts, and/or it costs you, and/or it won’t ultimately matter, and/or when no-one will ever know, and the closer you get to that scenario, the more reliable your test cases are.
When the former enemies are spontaneously helping each other with no external reward save a continuing lack of being exploded by a passing Murderbot 9000, then you can call it.