With An n-Foot Pole

Corporations sometimes need to distance themselves from certain markets or products. While this is sometimes a matter of dishonesty, although this is rarely the case in our Imperial business community, more commonly it's a simple matter of protecting reputational assets, either those of the company or those of its customers. Not every product or market, after all, is something that would be considered entirely respectable by the Names, Numbers, and Novas or by one's most desirable customers - even when it is entirely legal and ethical - and yet it would be a shame to leave their money on the table.

The customary methods of doing so have evolved their own nomenclature in Imperial business circles, named in accordance with the traditional metaphor for those things one would prefer not to touch: the 12' pole.

And so, we have:

the 6'-brand: A "six-brand" is a veil so thin it's barely there at all. (It is, after all, shorter than 12'.) It is, indeed, usually the case that everyone is perfectly aware that all a given company's brands belong to the same company and are thus associated; it's merely that everyone also agrees, as a matter of courteous social convention, to pretend that they aren't.

Even if the same house, and possibly even the same designers, are working on refined professional attire for Directorate members, haut couture for the debutanté attending the Banquet of the Season, tailored military uniforms for flag officers, and delightful nightwear for any of them later in the day, it makes everyone more comfortable to quietly ignore the connection.

Another common use of the 6'-brand is for testbed projects; a great many technology companies sell borderline-experimental or "bleeding-edge" products under a special brand intended to ensure that the inevitable issues of devices barely out of R&D are kept discretely separate from those of their trusty main product line.

the 12'-subsidiary: The 12'-subsidiary pushes the veil a little further. That said, the connection is still obvious to anyone who cares to do a little digging at the Office of Incorporates or into their finances, but the members of the primary company's Directorate can usually count on not being asked what their subsidiaries are doing in social situations, and few who aren't knowledgeable about the industry for some reason are likely to be aware of it.

Of course, most subsidiaries exist for practical reasons, such as joint ventures, need for a legal buffer, working around sovereign liability issues, and the like. A true 12'-subsidiary is one that only exists for reputational separation. To extend on the fashion example above, the company in question might desire a slightly greater reputational firewall between its fashionable products and, say, its manufacture of military utility uniforms, heavy work gear, or other soft goods such as K-blankets for catching debris. Practicalities of fiber engineering aside and psychosomatics likewise, a visible connection between one's lingerie and plasma-resistant reentry quilts can rather take the bloom off the rose.

the 24'-franchise: And then we come to the more serious situation of the 24'-franchise.

Now, a 24'-franchise is not a regular franchise. Astroburger is a franchise, and thanks to some of the galaxy's most effective branding, there is no-one on this side of the afterlife who is not aware of every branch's relationship to the parent company. Everwell Health Management Systems, Novacorpora, HabCapsule, Valuematic Vending, they're all franchise operations in part, and no-one's even slightly confused about who the parent corporation is.

(One particularly unusual example of this mode is Min Rosell Combine Mercantile, which has licensing relationships with most of the Big 26 and dozens of other corporations to sell quality-arbitraged versions of their products under their own Spacer's Choice, Good Sophont, and Rosell Better Living brands, and yet it is not particularly difficult to determine the underlying source, for all that said sources will stolidly refer any queries or contacts concerning these products back to the Combine Mercantile.)

A proper 24'-franchise, on the other hand, defies the traditional franchise model inasmuch as the independent operators in such a franchise or licensing relationship is usually expressly prohibited from selling under the parent's branding. A common variation of this is when the parent is licensing its technology - and, by contract and quiet inspection, will guarantee safe and proper use - but wants to disclaim any and all connection to what the franchisee, or rather, their customers want to use it for.

A good example of this would be certain Novacorpora franchisees. While decency forbids going into details, suffice it to say that there are more than a few body modifications in relatively high demand across the galaxy which do not bear any mention in society. The Novacorpora Directorate is, naturally, delighted to have found a way to take their money and still, should anyone be crass enough to imply a connection, shrug and point out that it would be grossly improper of them to exert noncontractual restraint on the use of their technology. "Barbarians. What can you do?"

Another variation on the 24'-franchise exists to preserve the customer's reputational assets. In parts of the Worlds, there are many people who wish to do business with Imperial corporations who would rather not be known to do business with Imperial corporations. While not as resilient against, say, government intrusion or sophisticated investigation as a proper 48'-veil, a well-set-up 24'-franchise can save face adequately for many such potential customers, and save leaving a market unserved for the honest merchant.

and the 48'-veil: The 48'-veil is the deepest, darkest one, and the one that is most easily confused with an arrangement designed to cover up some sort of corporate malfeasance. That's because it's a perfect arrangement to cover up almost any sort of corporate malfeasance; it's just not used that way.

A properly engineered 48'-veil is a carefully engineered deep separation that ensures that ownership splits into multiple chains via an assortment of blind trusts, boutique companies, smart contracts, mazes of ever-shifting AI-generated ephemeral corporations, holding stacks, etc., etc., across multiple jurisdictions, many of them selected for their complete refusal to cooperate with each other, and the way the money flows is, if anything, even more obscure and involves a lot of cryp and inconvenient-to-trace physical commodity assets.

Ideally, if you work really, really hard at investigating, you won't find your way through this thicket to the beneficial owner, but you might find out that the chain of command apparently ends at a shadowy synthespian figure operating under a nym-of-a-nym who calls himself "DarĂ­Ă« NeĂŻdar" (Ser One-Person) or "DarĂ­Ă« min Ólish" (Ser of-the-clan-of-Ólish, i.e., a ciseflish).

This one is used when a corporation never wants anyone ever to connect them to whatever is being done in public for the protection of their reputational assets. (This is actually quite uncommon: most things in this category are ethically untouchable; but on rare occasions the ethical course may involve selling to markets otherwise best avoided.)

It is also used when dealing in markets which require great protection for the customer's reputational assets. Where a 24'-franchise wouldn't succeed, because the people probing into the customer's private transactions are competent criminal investigators, intelligence agencies, or the like, a 48'-veil can open even those markets to the guiding corporation.

And where such is the case, these are the places where the light of commerce most needs to shine - even if under a veil.

– Business Slang of the Starfaring Age, Aurum Press (6900)


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://eldraeverse.com/2026/04/26/with-an-n-foot-pole
1 Like

While no actual cases of 48’-veil subsidiaries are provided because of course the whole point is that they’re secret, out of universe could you provide some examples? Or at least the hypothetical example that would be provided by a curious Eldrae wondering what kind of company would want to sell some kind of product across a 48’-veil and the extranet being presumably at least as helpful as our real life internet providing an example of a case where a hypothetical nonexistent company might want to sell hypothetical nonexistent product through a 48’-veil which could be used as an analogy for understanding the circumstances of actual companies selling things though 48’-veils.

Well
 there might be, hypothetically, some companies selling certain product-derivatives into various miserable Socionovist hellholes which make life marginally better for the poor sods stuck there. This is a classic case for a 48’-veil, both because your reputation at home may be impacted by doing any business there at all, and because anyone said places catch doing business with you, an Imperial starcorp, will go STRAIGHT TO GULAG if they’re lucky.

1 Like

On the other hand, it’s not like there aren’t a few combines that haven’t found it a convenient way to market a bunch of cheap, substandard weapons to an asshole revolutionary movement in exchange for valuable resources while also ensuring that they’re overconfident enough to charge in to attack their local government and all get slaughtered when their cheap, substandard weapons predictably fail against the counter the same combines sold the local government through a different organizational branch, thus ensuring that they got paid three times and the government still owes them one.

There’s a way to make a profit from almost any situation if you look at it right, after all.

1 Like

This article brought to you by Glock, purveyors of fine firearms and horse semen.

And, of course, various bits of the Empire’s Shadow also make use of the techniques, everywhere governments are out there getting their restrictions on. The Technic Imperative will, after all, sell access to tools and ideas to absolutely anyone, no matter how much effort their would-be masters put into stopping them.

Thinking back to Worldbuilding: Nonconsensual Robot Sex, another candidate for 48’-veils might be between sellers of rape simulation robots and buyers of rape simulation robots who understand and value consent enough to not engage in actual rape but for instinctive primal species-nature reasons still desire to engage in sexual activity involving coercive domination even in simulated form, the former doesn’t get the stigma of selling to rape simulation enjoyers but still get their money and the latter doesn’t get the stigma of being branded rape simulation enjoyers but still get their rape simulation robot, everyone’s happy and I’m pretty sure everything’s technically above board ethics and consent-wise, albeit still so morally disgusting to the vast majority of Eldraeic society that every party in this transaction wants to keep it hidden lest they be hit by sanctions.

That’s the sort of thing that may be edgy enough that you’d take it to the Board and they’d still be all, like, “So
 when do the buyers explode? They explode, right?”

"I am afraid that as long as the buyers do not commit any actual rape or other coercion on another sophont, prosophont, or other intelligent information processing system worthy of rights, we cannot simply make them explode without violating their rights ourselves because they have not technically yet done anything wrong Fundamental Contract-wise. No we cannot simply explode them preemptively in anticipation of their wrongdoing because we’re already only going to be selling to individuals in the very narrow demographic Venn diagram slice of ‘enjoys rape simulation’ and ‘almost certainly for very high values of ‘almost certainly’ not going to engage in actual rape even if we sell them rape simulation robots that let them indulge in their desires’ and given they have free will as well as the inherently chaotic and difficult to compute nature of the universe’s non-paracausal elements there is no way to predict which members of our customer base we should explode and which we should not due to them never actually engaging in rape or coercion in any point in the future.

There is however nothing forbidding us from subtly making sessions of sexual acts that are more violent and coercive notably but not noticeably less pleasant while making those closer to ideal mutual consent more enjoyable, thus slowly conditioning the consumer towards being a better person. In addition there’s also nothing stopping us from weaving subliminal guilt triggers and psychedesign/therapy advertisements into subconscious body language cues and other imperceivable audiovisual vectors. As long as we have the appropriate fine print giving us permission to do so hidden in the EULA of course.

Finally we do have a contingency to permanently stop the user from committing any harm including rape or appropriately administering them justice if they have already caused a rape via an integrated AI watching for any signs of consent violations with the 'bot’s sensors as well as monitoring the local dataweave for any news of crimes that highly indicate the existence of the user engaging in actual sexual coercion beyond sensor range. I regret to inform you however it does not involve exploding them, merely the application of razor sharp blades produced via strategic cleavage of diamondoid bone/chitin/other analogue for hard biological elements, electrocution, and a small dose of self-repair nanobots reprogrammed into a makeshift disassembler swarm. I hope that will suffice enough for your satisfaction."

Okay that’s my best Eldrae impression, how’d I do?

Let me ramble a little bit before I get to the point.


Culture-telling words are a marvelous thing.

It says something about the old Romans, for example, that Latin goes to the trouble of having a specific word for the concept of “line them all up and kill every tenth one”.

It probably says something about the Imperials that Eldraeic has a specific word for “one whom my ethics forbid me from killing, but in the knowledge of whose death I would find delight”.


Sadly, ciseflish metaphysical econometrics loses most of its poetry when I attempt to poorly translate it to the Earthican, but if you imagine kicking the cynicism up a notch on “the purpose of some lives appears to be serving as a warning to others”, you can arrive at “some people are just determined to be hate-fucked to death by their own karma”.

In the resulting liminal realm thrives a subculture of gun-runners and other breeds of death-merchants who are happy to sell people what they want, observe as it predictably and fatally blows up in their faces, and smile the happy smile of people who just got paid twice.


And as I believe I noted back here, people who go around being tricksy with contracts are imperiling the reputational assets of much bigger fish, and potentially triggering a process that ends with a new career running a taco cart in energy-being central.



So our takeaway here is that, so far as Imperial society is concerned, these are people who want to engage in simulations of what is, recall, “the most brutal and personal form of slavery” to get their jollies.

(And, no, they don’t care that it’s their instinctive primal species-nature. It’s their primal species nature to treat the universe as clay to build their solipsistic dreams out of and casually obliterate anything that might get in the way. They got over it. These people should too, and that their meta-desires don’t trend in that direction is another mark against them.)

So, y’know, the position they’re starting from here is “these filthy self-defiling slaver-wannabe degenerates should not exist in my universe, and it is only my deep philosophical commitment to doing the Right Thing even when it is not convenient that stands between them and an ambiplasma enema”.

And then you run into the problem with this precise liminal area in ciseflish economic ethics, which boils down to “there are terrible entropists in the universe; it is ethical to sell them the tools to further their own damnation, because they’re already damned and reaping any profit from their regrettable existence is, eo ipso, a victory against Entropy”.

But you’ve got to account for the externalities, and you definitely don’t want to be making those worse.

And in most types of sophont brains, indulging in things you find pleasurable, whether in reality or simulation, carves those pathways deeper. You’re literally making them worse, risking some horrible externalities, and you’re not doing so on a nice, clear pathway that involves them giving you all their money and resources in exchange for ropes to hang themselves with.

This, say your investors, is a problem.

2 Likes